news.volyx.in

Learning to code is still worthwhile (stevekrouse.com)

316 points by stevekrouse · 52 days ago · 309 comments on HN

Article summary

The article argues that learning to code is still worthwhile, despite the rise of AI and automated coding tools. The author believes that coding is a valuable skill for educational and creative purposes, and that it can help individuals develop problem-solving skills and learn mathematics. The article also touches on the idea that coding is a form of creative expression, similar to writing or music. The author encourages people to learn to code, not just for vocational purposes, but for personal enrichment and enjoyment.

Main themes

  • Value of coding
  • AI and automation
  • Creative expression
  • Education and learning
  • Problem-solving skills
  • Personal enrichment

What commenters say

  • Learning to code is still essential, even with the rise of AI, as it provides a foundation for understanding and working with technology.
  • The increasing power of AI models may eventually make coding skills obsolete, rendering the effort to learn to code unnecessary.
  • Coding is not just a practical skill, but also a creative outlet and a means of self-expression, similar to art or music.
  • The value of learning to code lies not in its potential for career advancement, but in its ability to exercise the brain and improve critical thinking skills.
  • The idea that coding is a valuable skill for everyone is overstated, and other skills, such as learning a musical instrument or a new language, may be just as beneficial.
  • The use of AI and automated coding tools may actually hinder the learning process, as it can make programmers intellectually lazy and less inclined to understand the underlying principles of coding.
  • Learning to code is not just about writing code, but about developing problem-solving skills, logical thinking, and attention to detail, which are valuable in many areas of life.
  • The argument that coding is essential for understanding and contributing to AI is not compelling, and other skills, such as mathematics or science, may be more relevant.