news.volyx.in

Fable 5 is Back (twitter.com)

407 points by mfiguiere · 57 days ago · 419 comments on HN

Article summary

The article appears to be about the return of Fable 5, a coding model, with some users expressing excitement and others discussing the limitations and costs associated with its use. The model is available for use at no extra cost as part of a subscription plan for a limited time, until July 7, 2026. Users are discussing their experiences and opinions on the model's capabilities and limitations. The discussion also touches on the company's pricing and capacity constraints.

Main themes

  • Fable 5 return
  • Coding model capabilities
  • Pricing and costs
  • Capacity constraints
  • Competition in AI market
  • Trust in US-based models

What commenters say

  • The return of Fable 5 is a significant event, with some users expressing excitement and anticipation for its capabilities.
  • The model's limitations and costs are a major concern for users, with some feeling that the pricing is too high and the capacity constraints are too restrictive.
  • Some users believe that the company's pricing strategy is designed to encourage users to upgrade to more expensive plans, rather than being driven by actual capacity constraints.
  • The discussion around Fable 5 highlights the growing competition in the AI market, with some users looking to alternative models and companies for their needs.
  • There is a perceived loss of trust in US-based models, with some users citing concerns over hype and doomsday messaging from companies like Anthropic.
  • Some users see Chinese firms releasing open weight models as a positive development, bringing much-needed competition to the market.
  • The use of Fable 5 and other coding models raises questions about the role of human designers and developers, with some users discussing the potential for automation and the importance of consistency in design.
  • The company's decision to limit the use of Fable 5 to 50% of weekly subscription limits has sparked debate among users, with some feeling that this is too restrictive and others seeing it as a necessary measure to manage capacity.