We can still stop California's 3D printer surveillance scheme (eff.org)

Article summary

The California State Assembly has passed a bill that mandates 3D printer surveillance software to prevent the manufacture of firearms without a license. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) opposes the bill, arguing that it censors lawful speech, builds out corporate surveillance, and criminalizes open source experimentation. The bill has undergone amendments, but the EFF's core concerns remain unaddressed. The EFF is calling on the state senate to drop the bill and protect the rights of 3D printer users.

Main themes

• 3D printing regulation
• gun control
• surveillance software
• free speech
• open source experimentation
• corporate surveillance

What commenters say

• The bill's attempt to restrict 3D printing of firearms is impractical and will not achieve its intended goal.
• The restriction on 3D printing plans is a violation of the First Amendment and sets a dangerous precedent for censorship.
• The focus should be on enforcing laws against undesirable actions, such as shooting people, rather than restricting the means by which they can be carried out.
• The bill's exemptions for commercial users, such as the entertainment industry, are unfair and will harm small creators and hobbyists.
• The use of 3D printing to manufacture firearms is not a significant concern, as other methods of manufacturing are more effective and accessible.
• The bill's requirements for proprietary, locked-down slicers from printer manufacturers will stifle innovation and limit consumer choice.
• The restriction on 3D printing is part of a broader trend of government overreach and erosion of individual freedoms.
• The bill's attempt to regulate 3D printing is a knee-jerk reaction to a perceived problem, rather than a thoughtful and effective solution.