Springer Nature has removed two studies by Max Planck (science.org)

Article summary

Springer Nature removed two studies by Max Planck, and despite the removal, the publisher is still selling the empty PDF for $39.95. The exact reason for the removal is unclear, but it has sparked a discussion about the state of scientific publishing and the role of for-profit journals. The removed studies are no longer available, and the publisher's decision has been criticized. The incident has highlighted the issues with the current scientific publishing model, including the high costs and restrictions on access to knowledge.

Main themes

• Scientific publishing
• For-profit journals
• Access to knowledge
• Academic integrity
• Capitalism and greed

What commenters say

• The current scientific publishing model is broken and prioritizes profits over the dissemination of knowledge.
• The removal of the studies and the continued sale of the empty PDF is a clear example of the exploitative nature of for-profit journals.
• The academic community has the power to change the system and promote open access to knowledge, but it requires a grassroots effort.
• The high costs and restrictions on access to knowledge are a result of the capitalist system and the pursuit of profit, which can lead to the suppression of important research.
• Some argue that the system is working as intended, and that the issues are a result of the academic community's own priorities and values.
• Others believe that the system can be changed through innovation and the addition of value to the publishing process, rather than simply relying on outdated models.
• The fact that the studies were removed and the PDF is still being sold suggests that the publisher is more interested in making a profit than in promoting academic integrity.
• The incident highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the scientific publishing industry.