If you are asking for human attention, demonstrate human effort (tombedor.dev)

Article summary

The article discusses the increasing use of AI-generated content in the workplace and the need to demonstrate human effort when sharing such content with teammates. The author argues that simply forwarding AI output without review or commentary can be seen as inconsiderate and a waste of the recipient's time. The author proposes a principle of clearly labeling AI-generated content and adding human commentary to show consideration for teammates. This approach helps maintain a touch of humanity in work and respects the scarcity of human attention.

Main themes

• AI-generated content
• Human effort and consideration
• Workplace communication
• AI quality and limitations
• Information overload

What commenters say

• The quality of AI-generated content is often poor and does not justify the time spent reading it.
• Labeling AI-generated content is not enough, as the quality of the content itself is what matters.
• The use of AI to generate text can be seen as a way to avoid actual human effort and thought.
• The value of a message lies in its usefulness to the recipient, not in how it was produced.
• There is a need to strike a balance between brevity and depth in communication, as excessive verbosity can be annoying.
• The increasing reliance on AI-generated content may lead to a decline in critical thinking and nuance in human communication.
• Citizens monitoring their government is a fundamental aspect of democracy, and technology can be a powerful tool in this effort.
• The use of AI to generate arguments or content without understanding the underlying context or intent can be problematic and disrespectful.