The desperation of NYTimes (rozumem.xyz)

Article summary

The article's content is not available, but the discussion reveals concerns about the New York Times' business practices, particularly regarding subscriptions and cancellation processes. Some commenters share their negative experiences with the NYT's app and subscription model. Others discuss alternative ways to access NYT content, such as through library subscriptions. The conversation also touches on the value of journalism and how to balance that with disapproval of certain business practices.

Main themes

• NYT subscription practices
• Library access to NYT content
• Value of journalism
• Business ethics
• Customer experience

What commenters say

• The NYT's subscription cancellation process is deliberately difficult and predatory, which is a major turn-off for some potential subscribers.
• Some people find value in the NYT's content and are willing to overlook its business practices, while others prioritize ethical considerations over the quality of the journalism.
• Library subscriptions can provide an alternative way to access NYT content without directly supporting the company's business practices.
• Boycotting companies with questionable practices can be an effective way to signal disapproval, but it may not always be noticed by the company's leadership.
• The value of good journalism can outweigh concerns about a company's business practices, but this is not always the case.
• Some commenters believe that making it hard to cancel a subscription is a form of fraud, while others see it as a marketing tactic.
• There is no clear way for consumers to signal both approval and disapproval of a company's practices, making it difficult to balance competing values.
• Alternative methods, such as using RSS feeds or email newsletters, can provide a way to access content without directly supporting a company's business practices.