news.volyx.in

Green card seekers must leave U.S. to apply, Trump administration says (nytimes.com)

1129 points by tlhunter · 52 days ago · 1990 comments on HN

Article summary

The Trump administration has announced a new policy requiring green card applicants to leave the US in order to apply, affecting hundreds of thousands of people. This policy change may impact those on temporary visas, including H1B workers and students, who will have to leave the country to apply for permanent residency. The policy aims to discourage people on temporary visas from applying for permanent residency. The change may have significant consequences for individuals, families, and the US economy.

Main themes

  • Immigration policy
  • Green card application
  • Temporary visas
  • US residency
  • Trump administration

What commenters say

  • The new policy is unfair and will cause undue hardship for individuals and families who will have to leave the US to apply for a green card.
  • The policy is intended to discourage people on temporary visas from applying for permanent residency, and will have a negative impact on immigration to the US.
  • The change will disproportionately affect certain groups, such as H1B workers and students, who will have to disrupt their lives to apply for a green card.
  • Some argue that the policy is a necessary measure to prevent abuse of the immigration system, while others see it as a xenophobic and cruel move.
  • The policy may lead to a significant decrease in legal immigration to the US, with potentially negative consequences for the economy and society.
  • The requirement to leave the US to apply for a green card may cause difficulties for couples and families, including those with US citizen spouses or children.
  • Some commenters argue that the policy is not new and is consistent with existing immigration law, while others see it as a significant change with far-reaching consequences.
  • The policy may be seen as part of a broader effort to restrict immigration to the US, with some arguing that it is a necessary measure to protect national security and others seeing it as a discriminatory move.