news.volyx.in

Eric Schmidt speech about AI booed during graduation (nbcnews.com)

380 points by nothrowaways · 103 days ago · 400 comments on HN

Article summary

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was booed during a commencement speech at the University of Arizona while discussing artificial intelligence. Schmidt drew a parallel between AI and the transformative impact of the computer, which was met with disapproval from the audience. He argued that the future remains unwritten and that the graduating class has the power to shape how AI develops. The speech was part of the university's graduation ceremony, where Schmidt was invited to speak due to his leadership and contributions to technology and innovation.

Main themes

  • AI impact on jobs
  • Technological change
  • Corporate responsibility
  • Generational concerns
  • Future of work

What commenters say

  • The development and implementation of AI is the responsibility of those using the technology, not the general populace, and they must ensure it is used responsibly.
  • The quote 'the future is not yet finished' can be interpreted as a call to action for graduates to shape the future of AI, but also as a dismissal of their concerns about the technology's impact.
  • The rise of AI is seen as a threat to the livelihoods of college graduates, who may face a harder time finding jobs due to automation and the increasing use of machine learning.
  • Some people believe that AI has the potential to bring about significant benefits, such as improving learning and research, and that individuals must adapt to the changing job market.
  • Others argue that the focus on AI's potential benefits ignores the immediate concerns of young people who are facing an uncertain future and may be displaced by automation.
  • There is a perception that the tech industry and corporations are out of touch with the concerns of the general public, and that they prioritize profits over people's well-being.
  • The idea that AI is inevitable and that people should learn to accept it is seen as a form of victim-blaming, and that instead, people should be working to shape the technology's development and mitigate its negative impacts.