news.volyx.in

South Korea introduces universal basic mobile data access (theregister.com)

422 points by saikatsg · 141 days ago · 126 comments on HN

Article summary

South Korea has introduced a universal basic mobile data access scheme, providing over seven million subscribers with unlimited downloads at 400 kbps after their data allowances expire. The scheme is part of an effort to guarantee basic telecommunications rights for all citizens and to re-earn the social license of the country's telcos after recent security lapses. The government has also extracted promises from telcos to introduce low-priced 5G plans and increase data and calling allowances for senior citizens. The scheme is seen as a step towards making AI applications accessible to all.

Main themes

  • Universal basic mobile data access
  • Telecom regulation
  • Digital rights
  • AI accessibility
  • Net neutrality

What commenters say

  • The universal basic mobile data access scheme is not truly universal since it requires a paid plan with an allowance to access the unlimited 400 kbps data.
  • Having access to information is a fundamental right, and the scheme is a step in the right direction, even if it's not perfect.
  • The distinction between positive and negative rights is important in understanding the concept of universal basic mobile data access, with some arguing that it's a positive right that requires the government to provide for it.
  • The UK's net neutrality regulations are not strict enough, as they allow for zero-rating schemes and tiered access, which deviate from the principle of treating all network traffic equally.
  • The US has its own affordable broadband schemes, such as the Lifeline program, but they are not as comprehensive as South Korea's universal basic mobile data access scheme.
  • The concept of net neutrality is not theoretical, but rather a default setting that requires special effort to deviate from, and any deviation from it cannot be considered true net neutrality.
  • The main issue with net neutrality is not zero-rating, but rather degradation or blocking of content and services, which can be problematic for essential services like online banking.
  • The technical implementation of zero-rating schemes can be problematic, as it requires ISPs to have knowledge of the domains being visited, which can raise privacy concerns.