I won't download your app. The web version is a-ok (0xsid.com)

Article summary

The article discusses the author's preference for using web versions of services over native apps, citing the ability to control the experience and avoid invasive tracking. Many companies prioritize their apps over web versions, often making the web experience intentionally worse to encourage app downloads. This can lead to a poor user experience and a lack of control over personal data. The author argues that most apps are simply thin clients that fetch and render data, making native apps unnecessary for many use cases.

Main themes

• Web vs Native Apps
• User Control and Privacy
• App Development and Design
• Enshittification Loop
• User Experience and Accessibility

What commenters say

• Some users prefer web versions of services due to better control over their experience and data, and will avoid apps that are pushed aggressively.
• Native apps can provide a better experience than web versions, especially for services that require access to device hardware or offer more features.
• Companies often intentionally make their web versions worse to encourage app downloads, which can be seen as a manipulative tactic.
• The enshittification loop, where companies degrade their web versions to push users to apps, can be an effective but frustrating strategy for users who prefer the web.
• Having both a good web version and a native app can be beneficial, as it allows users to choose their preferred method of interaction.
• Some users are willing to use native apps if they offer significant advantages over web versions, such as improved performance or features.
• The use of apps can be seen as a trade-off between convenience and privacy, with some users prioritizing one over the other.
• Developers may not always be aware of the impact of their design decisions on the user experience, and may prioritize company goals over user needs.