news.volyx.in

German implementation of eIDAS will require an Apple/Google account to function (bmi.usercontent.opencode.de)

575 points by DyslexicAtheist · 102 days ago · 651 comments on HN

Article summary

The German implementation of eIDAS, a European digital identity law, will reportedly require users to have an Apple or Google account to function. This has sparked discussion about the effectiveness and user-friendliness of the system. The eIDAS law aims to make electronic IDs emitted by different EU governments intercompatible, allowing citizens to use their digital identity to authenticate and sign documents across the EU. The implementation details and requirements are still unclear, with some commenters expressing concerns about the need for Apple or Google accounts.

Main themes

  • eIDAS implementation
  • Digital identity
  • EU regulations
  • User authentication
  • Tech company involvement

What commenters say

  • The eIDAS system is overly complex and user-unfriendly, with some arguing that it is a design by committee project with no consideration for market fit or productivity.
  • The requirement for Apple or Google accounts is unnecessary and may be a result of big tech lobbying, with some advocating for the use of X.509 certificates instead.
  • The use of digital signatures and certificates is a more secure and reliable method of authentication than current systems, but the implementation is still in its early stages and has many issues to resolve.
  • The German implementation of eIDAS is a step towards reducing dependence on foreign tech and infra, but its effectiveness and user-friendliness are still uncertain.
  • Some argue that the reputation of German engineering culture is fading, with many examples of poor software and infrastructure projects, while others defend the use of SAP software as a necessary tool for standardizing and automating business processes.
  • There is a need for a more transparent and cost-effective system for obtaining and using digital certificates, with some commenters expressing frustration at the high costs and complexity of current solutions.