news.volyx.in

Nasdaq's Shame (keubiko.substack.com)

425 points by imichael · 169 days ago · 167 comments on HN

Article summary

Nasdaq is proposing changes to its index methodology, which could allow SpaceX to be added to the Nasdaq-100 index immediately after its IPO, potentially manipulating the market and benefiting corporate insiders. The proposed 'Fast Entry' rule and 5x multiplier for low-float stocks could force passive index funds to buy large amounts of SpaceX stock, artificially inflating its price. This could result in a massive supply-and-demand squeeze, benefiting SpaceX and its early investors. The changes are seen as a way for Nasdaq to win SpaceX's listing business away from the NYSE.

Main themes

  • Index manipulation
  • Market structure
  • Passive investing
  • Corporate influence
  • Regulatory concerns

What commenters say

  • The proposed changes to Nasdaq's index methodology will unfairly benefit SpaceX and its early investors at the expense of passive index fund investors.
  • The changes will have a limited impact on most investors, as SpaceX will only comprise a small percentage of the indexes in question.
  • Investors in Nasdaq index funds, such as QQQ, will be forced to buy SpaceX stock and may be subject to artificial price inflation.
  • Some investors believe that actively managed portfolios or alternative indexes may be a better option to avoid potential manipulation.
  • The issue highlights the problems with passive investing and the need for more transparency and regulation in the financial industry.
  • The proposed changes may not affect all index funds, such as those tracking the S&P 500, which have different rules and methodologies.
  • Investors who are already invested in Nasdaq index funds may be trapped due to substantial gains and should consider alternative investments for future dollars.