Global warming has accelerated significantly (researchsquare.com)

Article summary

A preprint study suggests that global warming has accelerated significantly since 2015, after accounting for natural variability factors such as El Niño, volcanism, and solar variation. The study finds that the global temperature has risen faster in the past 10 years than in any previous 10-year period since 1945. The study has not yet been peer-reviewed by a journal. The authors are well-published and highly cited in the field of climate science.

Main themes

• climate change
• peer review
• open access
• scientific publishing
• preprints
• research methodology
• climate science

What commenters say

• The paper's preprint status means it has not been vetted and should be treated with caution until peer-reviewed.
• The fact that the paper is open-access and has a DOI makes it preferable to link to the original source rather than a secondary platform.
• Peer review is an important part of scientific publication, but it is not a guarantee of a paper's validity or truth.
• Non-experts should reserve judgment on the paper's findings until the scientific community has evaluated them.
• The paper's authors are reputable and their work is highly cited, which lends credibility to the study.
• The use of preprints can be useful for sharing research quickly, but it can also lead to the dissemination of unverified information.
• The paper's findings should be considered in the context of the larger body of evidence on climate change, rather than as a standalone result.
• The scientific community's evaluation of the paper will ultimately determine its validity and impact.