news.volyx.in

You can't refuse to be scanned by ICE's facial recognition app, DHS document say (404media.co)

601 points by nh43215rgb · 266 days ago · 509 comments on HN

Article summary

A Department of Homeland Security document reveals that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) uses a facial recognition app called Mobile Fortify to verify a person's identity and immigration status, and that individuals cannot refuse to be scanned. The app stores face photos for 15 years, regardless of immigration or citizenship status. This technology is used by ICE and Customs and Border Protection to scan people's faces in public areas. The document provides details on the technology and data storage behind Mobile Fortify.

Main themes

  • Facial Recognition Technology
  • Government Surveillance
  • Immigration Policy
  • Biometric Data Storage
  • Corporate Influence on Government
  • Voter Responsibility

What commenters say

  • The use of facial recognition technology by ICE is a violation of individual privacy and a step towards a comprehensive government database of biometric data.
  • The government's use of facial recognition is a form of state terrorism and a threat to civil liberties.
  • Corporations play a significant role in shaping government policies, including those related to surveillance and immigration.
  • The issue of facial recognition and government surveillance is not unique to the US, but is a global phenomenon with many countries implementing similar technologies.
  • Some argue that the problem of government overreach is a result of voter complacency and the influence of corporate interests on the political process.
  • Others believe that the issue is more complex and involves a range of factors, including the normalization of authoritarianism and the role of social media in shaping public opinion.
  • There is disagreement over the extent to which voters support authoritarian policies, with some arguing that a significant portion of voters back these measures, while others claim that this support is overstated.
  • The use of facial recognition technology is seen as a feature, not a bug, by some, who believe it can be used to enforce immigration policy and maintain social control.