AWS to bare metal two years later: Answering your questions about leaving AWS (oneuptime.com)

Article summary

The article discusses a company's experience of migrating from AWS to bare metal two years ago, resulting in significant cost savings of over $1.2M per year. The company has achieved 99.993% measured availability and has invested the savings in expanding their infrastructure and services. They have also addressed concerns and questions from the community, including the use of Savings Plans, Reserved Instances, and the potential for single points of failure. The company still uses cloud services for certain tasks, such as Glacier backups and CloudFront edge caching.

Main themes

• Cloud vs Bare Metal
• Cost Savings
• Infrastructure Management
• Scalability and Reliability
• Cloud Services and Vendor Lock-in

What commenters say

• Bare metal can be a more cost-effective option for companies with stable workloads, but may require more expertise and management.
• The use of cloud services like AWS can be expensive and may not always be the best option for every company, despite its convenience and scalability.
• Some commenters argue that the benefits of bare metal are overstated and that cloud services provide sufficient reliability and scalability for most use cases.
• Others disagree, citing the high cost of cloud services and the potential for vendor lock-in, and argue that bare metal provides more control and flexibility.
• The need for expertise and management is a significant factor in the choice between cloud and bare metal, with some arguing that it is not a significant burden and others seeing it as a major drawback.
• The article's claims of cost savings and reliability are seen as persuasive by some, but others remain skeptical and argue that the benefits of cloud services outweigh the costs.
• The use of cloud services for specific tasks, such as edge caching and backups, is seen as a viable option by some, while others argue that it is better to use bare metal for all infrastructure needs.
• The choice between cloud and bare metal ultimately depends on the specific needs and circumstances of each company, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution.