Self-taught engineers often outperform (2024) (michaelbastos.com)

Article summary

The article argues that self-taught engineers can outperform those with formal education due to their hands-on experience and passion for learning. It suggests that formal education can provide a foundation, but it is the act of tinkering and experimenting that truly fosters mastery. The article cites examples of successful engineers who learned through self-directed experimentation. It also emphasizes the importance of mentorship, but notes that it should complement, not replace, self-directed learning.

Main themes

• self-taught vs formal education
• importance of hands-on experience
• role of mentorship
• passion and motivation
• survivorship bias
• industry context

What commenters say

• Self-taught engineers often outperform due to their passion and hands-on experience, but this may be due to survivorship bias.
• Formal education provides a foundation, but self-directed learning is necessary for true mastery.
• The value of self-taught vs formally educated engineers depends on the specific context and industry.
• University education can provide a structured learning environment that self-taught individuals may lack.
• Self-taught engineers may miss out on learning the boring details and theoretical foundations of computer science.
• The ability to learn and adapt is more important than the method of learning, whether self-taught or formally educated.