Supreme Court's ruling practically wipes out free speech for sex writing online (ellsberg.substack.com)

Article summary

The article discusses a Supreme Court ruling that may limit free speech online, particularly for sex writing. The ruling's implications for video and audio content are unclear. The decision has sparked concerns about censorship and the erosion of free speech protections. The ruling may be based on the idea that certain content is 'damaging to children'.

Main themes

• free speech
• online censorship
• Supreme Court ruling
• cancel culture
• government regulation
• social progressivism
• liberal values

What commenters say

• The Supreme Court's ruling may not be limited to written content and could apply to other forms of online expression.
• The distinction between government regulation of speech and private regulation of speech is key in the court of law, but may be less relevant from a philosophical perspective.
• Cancel culture is seen by some as a form of social coercion that can be detrimental to free speech, while others view it as a natural consequence of individual choices.
• Some argue that the left and right are both guilty of suppressing free speech, with the left engaging in cancel culture and the right pushing for laws that restrict certain types of speech.
• The notion of free speech is being redefined, with some arguing that it only applies to government censorship, while others believe it should also protect individuals from social and cultural backlash.
• There is a concern that young people are no longer seeing free speech as a foundational value and are willing to sacrifice it for other goals and values.
• The ACLU's priorities have shifted, with some arguing that it now prioritizes social progressivism over liberal foundations and free speech protections.