The movie mistake mystery from "Revenge of the Sith" (fxrant.blogspot.com)

Article summary

The article discusses the issue of movie mistakes being removed or altered in later versions of films, using the example of 'Revenge of the Sith'. The author argues that this practice can be seen as a form of revisionist history, altering the original work. Some people prefer to watch the original versions of movies, warts and all, while others may not notice or care about the changes. The article highlights the importance of preserving the original versions of films.

Main themes

• Movie mistakes
• Film preservation
• Revisionist history
• Special editions
• Original vs altered versions

What commenters say

• Altering movie mistakes in later versions is a form of revisionist history that can be seen as wrong, as it changes the original work.
• Preserving the original versions of films is important, as they are a part of history and should be available for viewing in their original form.
• Some people prefer to watch the original versions of movies, even with mistakes, as they provide a glimpse into the filmmaking process and are a part of the film's character.
• Correcting mistakes and altering films can be seen as an improvement, making the movie more enjoyable and polished for modern audiences.
• The availability of original versions is not always guaranteed, and re-releases often replace the original, making it difficult for viewers to access the unchanged version.
• The practice of altering films is comparable to destroying original art, as it changes the creator's original vision and intent.
• The decision to alter or preserve a film is a complex issue, with different opinions on what constitutes an 'original' version and what changes are acceptable.