Sourcegraph went dark (eric-fritz.com)

Article summary

The article discusses how Sourcegraph, a code search platform, has made its repository private, which has caused issues for users who relied on its open nature. The author, a former employee, expresses disappointment and has taken steps to preserve links to commits and pull requests. The company's CEO has responded, stating that the public code search remains available and a snapshot of the code has been made public. The change has sparked a discussion about the implications of open-source projects becoming private.

Main themes

• Open-source software
• Code search platforms
• Repository privacy
• Community impact
• Business models
• Software development

What commenters say

• Making a previously open-source repository private can have significant negative impacts on the community that relies on it.
• The decision to make the repository private may be driven by business considerations, such as focusing on building a great product and making money.
• Some users are concerned that the change will limit access to information and make it harder to find obscure or hard-to-find code.
• Others argue that the company's public code search remains a valuable resource and that the private repository does not affect its usefulness.
• The move to a private repository has sparked concerns about the long-term viability of the project and the potential for alternatives to emerge.
• Some commenters have expressed disappointment and frustration with the change, while others have offered alternative solutions and workarounds.
• The decision to make the repository private has raised questions about the balance between open-source principles and business needs.
• The community is exploring alternative code search platforms and solutions in response to the change.