news.volyx.in

With fifth busy beaver, researchers approach computation's limits (quantamagazine.org)

550 points by LegionMammal978 · 770 days ago · 137 comments on HN

Article summary

Researchers have verified the value of BB(5), a number that quantifies the busy beaver function, which is related to the halting problem in computer science. The busy beaver function is a measure of the maximum number of steps a Turing machine with a given number of rules can take before halting. The value of BB(5) was determined to be 47,176,870 using a piece of software called the Coq proof assistant. This achievement is a significant milestone in the study of computation's limits.

Main themes

  • Busy beaver function
  • Halting problem
  • Turing machines
  • Computational complexity
  • Formal verification

What commenters say

  • The busy beaver function has different definitions and notations, which can lead to confusion when comparing results.
  • The proof of BB(5) is a significant achievement, but it is unclear whether the champion programs will be clean or spaghetti-like in their code and behavior.
  • Some researchers believe that the champion programs will tend to be complicated and exhibit fractal-like behavior, while others argue that they may be clean and efficient.
  • The use of formal verification tools like Coq is essential for ensuring the correctness of complex proofs, but it is unclear whether these tools will become more widely used in mathematics.
  • The discovery of BB(5) is a notable example of a computer-assisted proof, but it is not the first such proof and will likely not be the last.
  • The behavior of busy beaver programs is difficult to predict and analyze, and it is unclear whether they will always be fractal-like or exhibit other patterns.
  • The distinction between using custom computer programs for computations and writing proofs in a general-purpose theorem checker like Coq is an important one in the context of formal verification.
  • The proof of BB(5) is a significant achievement, but it is also important to consider the limitations and potential errors of computer-assisted proofs.