Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get it in the air (seattletimes.com)

Article summary

The article discusses Boeing's request to exempt the MAX 7 from certain safety rules to get it in the air. Commenters are concerned about the potential risks of this exemption, drawing parallels with disabling unit tests or relying on human intervention to prevent accidents. The discussion also touches on the company's history and culture, with some commenters blaming the influence of MBAs and the merger with McDonnell Douglas for Boeing's current issues. The exemption request is seen as a way to avoid taking a test, rather than addressing the underlying safety concerns.

Main themes

• Boeing safety concerns
• Corporate culture and management
• Aviation regulation and testing
• Cost-cutting and profit prioritization
• Industry trends and passenger preferences

What commenters say

• Boeing's request to exempt the MAX 7 from safety rules is a dangerous and short-sighted move that prioritizes profits over safety.
• The company's culture has been compromised by the influence of MBAs and the pursuit of cost-cutting measures.
• Pilots are more trustworthy than Boeing's automated systems, which have been shown to be flawed.
• The exemption request is a result of Boeing's attempt to avoid taking a test, rather than addressing the underlying safety concerns.
• The merger with McDonnell Douglas marked a turning point in Boeing's history, leading to a focus on bean-counting and corner-cutting.
• Nationalizing Boeing might be a solution to its problems, but it is unlikely to happen in the current political climate.
• The pursuit of fuel efficiency and cost savings has led airlines to prioritize slower flight speeds, which can be frustrating for passengers but is a necessary trade-off for lower ticket prices.