3M knew its chemicals were harmful decades ago, but didn't tell the public (minnesotareformer.com)

Article summary

3M knew its chemicals, including perfluorochemicals, were harmful decades ago but didn't inform the public or government. Internal documents show the company was aware of the chemicals' toxicity and environmental contamination but chose to hide the information. The company has faced lawsuits and settlements, including an $850 million settlement with the state of Minnesota. 3M still maintains that its chemicals have no adverse health or environmental consequences.

Main themes

• Corporate Accountability
• Environmental Regulation
• Toxic Chemicals
• Government Oversight
• Personal Liability

What commenters say

• Corporations should be held accountable for their actions and face severe penalties for misconduct, including potentially being dismantled. Some argue that fines are ineffective as a deterrent for large corporations, and alternative punishments, such as 'corporate capital punishment,' should be considered. Others believe that the problem lies in the lack of effective regulation and enforcement, allowing companies to prioritize profits over safety and the environment. The effectiveness of laws and regulations in preventing data breaches and environmental disasters is questioned, with some arguing that stricter laws and harsher penalties are needed. It is suggested that the scale of punishment should be proportional to the company's wealth and income, to serve as a meaningful deterrent. The role of personal accountability for executives and employees involved in misconduct is also debated, with some arguing that they should face criminal prosecution and financial liability. The influence of corporate interests and lobbying on government policies and regulations is seen as a significant obstacle to effective regulation and accountability.
• themes”: [