Developer account removed by Apple (seraleev.notion.site)

Article summary

The article discusses a developer's account being removed by Apple, but the details of the article are not available. The comments suggest that the developer had multiple apps with similar patterns and pricing models, which some commenters find suspicious. The developer's apps had high revenue, with one commenter estimating around $5,000 per month per app. The removal of the account may be related to Apple's policies on subscription pricing and bait-and-switch tactics.

Main themes

• Apple's app review policies
• subscription pricing models
• bait-and-switch tactics
• developer accountability
• user protection
• conflict of interest in app revenue sharing

What commenters say

• Some commenters believe that Apple was in the right to remove the developer's account due to suspicious app behavior and pricing models.
• Others argue that Apple's policies are unclear and unfairly enforced, leading to the removal of the account without sufficient notice or appeal.
• The developer's use of high-priced subscription models, such as $3.99 per week, is seen as predatory by some and a legitimate business practice by others.
• There is disagreement over whether the developer's apps were truly worthy of their high revenue, with some commenters suggesting that the apps were not unique or valuable enough to justify their prices.
• Some commenters think that Apple should be more consistent in enforcing its policies, particularly with regards to bait-and-switch tactics and dark patterns in app design.
• Others believe that the developer's removal was justified due to their attempts to manipulate users into subscribing to their apps, as evidenced by their rapid updates to comply with Apple's policies.
• The discussion highlights the tension between developers' need to make a profit and users' need for protection from exploitative pricing models and app design practices.
• Some commenters argue that Apple's 30% cut of app revenue creates a conflict of interest, where the company prioritizes its own profits over user protection and fair business practices.