Encrypting private data and private communications is now an ethical duty (blog.tripu.info)

Article summary

The article argues that encrypting private data and communications is now an ethical duty due to proposed legislation in the EU that would allow for mass surveillance. The author suggests that citizens should resist such laws and use encryption tools to protect their privacy. The article also mentions the importance of encryption for various professions, such as journalists and healthcare professionals. The author encourages readers to take action and make encryption a staple of their digital life.

Main themes

• encryption
• mass surveillance
• civil disobedience
• power dynamics
• privacy
• security
• ethics and morality

What commenters say

• Using encryption is a moral imperative to protect individual privacy and security in the face of mass surveillance.
• The effectiveness of encryption as a form of civil disobedience relies on widespread adoption, making it difficult for governments to outlaw or enforce surveillance.
• Some argue that relying on corporate-provided encryption solutions is insufficient and that individuals should take personal responsibility for their own encryption needs.
• Others believe that the use of encryption is not a viable solution for the general public due to its complexity and limited adoption.
• The concept of 'might makes right' is seen as a fundamental principle underlying power dynamics, but others argue that cooperation and diplomacy can be more effective means of achieving and maintaining power.
• The importance of encryption is not limited to personal security, but also extends to professions that require confidentiality, such as journalism and healthcare.
• There is a debate about the existence of a 'permanent ground truth' for morals and laws, with some arguing that it is necessary for a functioning society, while others see it as a myth.
• The use of encryption is seen as a way to push back against government overreach and protect individual freedoms, but others argue that it is not a sufficient solution to address the underlying issues of power and control.