The worst programmer I know (dannorth.net)

Article summary

The article's content is unavailable, but the discussion reveals a critique of management and productivity metrics in the tech industry. Commenters debate the effectiveness of measuring management productivity and the potential consequences of such metrics. Some argue that management is often self-serving and prioritizes short-term gains over long-term success. The discussion also touches on the role of unions and labor organizations in protecting workers' rights.

Main themes

• management productivity
• labor unions
• performance metrics
• organizational structure
• short-term vs long-term thinking
• technical excellence vs business goals

What commenters say

• Implementing management productivity metrics could lead to more accountability and better decision-making.
• Unions can provide job security and protect workers from unfair management practices, but may not always prioritize performance-based metrics.
• Measuring management productivity is challenging due to the subjective nature of their work and the potential for gaming the system.
• Some companies have successfully implemented flat organizational structures or minimized management roles, leading to increased productivity and success.
• The use of metrics can be a tool for control, and managers may resist being measured by their employees.
• Correlation does not necessarily imply causation, and anecdotal evidence of successful managers or teams may not be representative of the broader industry.
• Short-term thinking and prioritization of personal gain can lead to poor management decisions and negatively impact long-term business success.
• The value of individual contributors, such as engineers, is often underestimated by management, who may prioritize short-term gains over technical excellence and long-term sustainability.