Daniel Ellsberg has died (nytimes.com)

Article summary

The article reports on the death of Daniel Ellsberg, but the content is not available. The discussion reveals that Ellsberg was a key figure in exposing government secrets, and his legacy is being compared to that of other whistleblowers like Manning, Snowden, and Assange. The New York Times' obituary is criticized for not mentioning these comparisons. Ellsberg's impact on history is still being debated, with some seeing him as a hero and others as a complex figure with a nuanced legacy.

Main themes

• Daniel Ellsberg's legacy
• Whistleblowing and government secrecy
• Morality and honesty in journalism
• The Espionage Act and national security
• Comparisons to other whistleblowers
• The role of media in shaping public opinion

What commenters say

• The New York Times' obituary for Daniel Ellsberg is criticized for not mentioning his connections to other whistleblowers like Manning, Snowden, and Assange.
• Ellsberg's legacy is seen as a continuation of his heroic actions, with some arguing that his work with other whistleblowers is a key part of his story.
• The story of Abraham and Sodom is used as an analogy to discuss the concept of honesty and morality in the context of Ellsberg's actions.
• Some argue that the Espionage Act is a ridiculous law that has been used to persecute individuals for political gain, while others see it as a necessary tool for protecting national security.
• The comparison between Ellsberg and other whistleblowers is seen as relevant to understanding his legacy and impact on history.
• The discussion of Ellsberg's legacy raises questions about the role of morality and honesty in journalism and government.
• The New York Times' decision to omit certain details from Ellsberg's obituary is seen as a deliberate choice that reflects the paper's biases or agendas.