AirDrop is now limited to 10 minutes (twitter.com)

Article summary

The article's content is not available, but the discussion revolves around Apple's policies and practices, including its relationship with China and its decision-making regarding app availability on the App Store. Commenters are discussing the implications of these policies and comparing them to the actions of other companies and individuals, such as Elon Musk and Twitter. The conversation touches on issues of censorship, free speech, and corporate responsibility. The initial topic of AirDrop being limited to 10 minutes is not directly addressed in the comments.

Main themes

• Apple's policies and practices
• Elon Musk and Twitter
• Censorship and free speech
• Corporate responsibility
• China's influence on international business
• Authoritarian regimes and human rights
• Private platforms and regulation

What commenters say

• Apple's policies and actions are seen as hypocritical and self-serving by some commenters, who point to the company's relationship with China and its handling of certain apps on the App Store.
• Some argue that Elon Musk's views on free speech are not universal and that he has bowed to pressure from authoritarian regimes, such as China, in order to benefit his business interests.
• Others defend Musk's right to manage his private platform as he sees fit, citing the paradox of tolerance and the need to balance free speech with the need to protect users from harm.
• There is disagreement about the extent to which companies like Apple and individuals like Musk are beholden to authoritarian regimes and the implications of this for issues like censorship and free speech.
• Some commenters argue that it is unfair to criticize individuals or companies for not speaking out on certain issues, such as the protests in China, and that this type of criticism can be a form of propaganda.
• Others believe that it is reasonable to expect companies and individuals with significant influence to take a stand on important issues, even if it is not directly related to their business interests.
• The discussion also touches on the issue of corporate responsibility and the need for companies to be transparent and consistent in their decision-making and actions.
• There are differing opinions on the role of companies like Apple and Twitter in regulating speech and balancing competing interests, with some arguing that they have a responsibility to protect users and others arguing that they should not censor speech.
• The relationship between China and companies like Apple and Tesla is seen as problematic by some commenters, who argue that these companies are complicit in China's authoritarian practices and human rights abuses.