A prank cursor resulted in an employee being fired before they started (2020) (devblogs.microsoft.com)

Article summary

An intern at Microsoft inserted a prank into the Windows 3.1 codebase, changing the cursor to a middle finger under certain conditions. The prank was discovered when the build was released to beta testers and nearly made it into a screenshot in an industry magazine. The company responded by saying the individual responsible was no longer with the company, but the intern was actually rehired a few weeks later. The incident highlights the importance of code reviews and QA processes.

Main themes

• prank culture
• code reviews
• QA processes
• angry mobs
• justice system
• free speech
• accountability
• scapegoating

What commenters say

• Some argue that angry mobs can be a signal of a gap in the justice system, while others see them as a threat to due process and fair treatment.
• There is a need for legislation to protect against mob-triggered terminations and doxxing, which can have severe consequences for individuals.
• Others believe that companies should not give in to mob pressure and instead investigate incidents thoroughly before making decisions.
• Some think that social media platforms can play a role in preventing the formation of mobs and reducing their impact.
• It is argued that public servants and those in positions of power should be held to higher standards and face consequences for their actions.
• The line between free speech and harmful speech is often blurred, and it is difficult to determine when speech crosses the line into incitement or harassment.
• Temporary firings or scapegoating can be used as a tactic to placate angry mobs, but this approach can be seen as insincere and damaging to the individual involved.
• The concept of scapegoating as a service is seen as a potential solution to the problem of mob pressure, but it raises ethical concerns and questions about accountability.