news.volyx.in

PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3 (old.reddit.com)

571 points by diplodocusaur · 1743 days ago · 315 comments on HN

Article summary

The article discusses the upcoming changes to Chrome's extension system, known as Manifest V3, which may affect the functionality of ad blockers like uBlock and AdBlock. The changes have sparked a discussion about the role of ads on the web and the impact of ad blocking on content creators. The article's content is not available, but the comments reveal a debate about the pros and cons of ad blocking and the ethics of online advertising. The discussion touches on issues like privacy, security, and the user experience.

Main themes

  • ad blocking
  • online advertising
  • user privacy
  • security
  • content creation
  • personalized ads
  • user experience
  • ad tech industry practices

What commenters say

  • Some people believe that ads are a necessary source of revenue for content creators and that ad blocking is unfair.
  • Others argue that ads are a problem due to their intrusive nature, data collection, and impact on user experience.
  • Personalized ads are seen as a particular issue, with some arguing that they are an invasion of privacy and can lead to price discrimination.
  • The use of ad blockers is defended as a necessary measure to protect user privacy and security, with some arguing that the ad tech industry's practices are unacceptable.
  • There is disagreement about the effectiveness of personalized ads, with some arguing that they can be useful and others seeing them as a nuisance.
  • Some commenters suggest that a better approach would be to use context-based advertising, which does not rely on user tracking.
  • The discussion also touches on the issue of malicious ads and the need for ad blockers to protect users from security threats.
  • Ultimately, the debate revolves around the trade-offs between the benefits of online advertising and the costs to user privacy and experience.