Media blackout after key witness against Assange admits lying (medialens.org)

Article summary

A key witness against Julian Assange has admitted to lying after being recruited by US authorities, which some believe could be the end of the case against him. The witness, who has a history of convictions for sexual abuse of minors and financial fraud, was given immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony. The development has sparked discussion about the media's coverage of the case and the potential implications for Assange's extradition. The witness's admission has raised questions about the credibility of the case against Assange.

Main themes

• Media bias and coverage
• Julian Assange case
• US government actions
• Witness credibility
• Extradition implications
• Government accountability

What commenters say

• The media's lack of coverage of the witness's admission is a sign of bias and complicity in burying stories that don't fit a particular narrative.
• The case against Assange is flawed and the witness's admission is further evidence of this.
• The media's coverage of the case is not a conspiracy, but rather a reflection of the story's lack of interest to the general public.
• The US government's actions in the case, including the recruitment of a questionable witness, are a cause for concern.
• The witness's admission is not necessarily the end of the case against Assange, as the charges against him are complex and multifaceted.
• The media's failure to cover the story is a result of their reliance on anonymous sources and propaganda plants from intelligence agencies.
• The case against Assange is a test of the media's ability to report on stories that challenge the powerful and the government.
• The witness's admission has significant implications for the credibility of the US government's case against Assange and the potential for his extradition.