Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results (twitter.com)

Article summary

Google has a process for voluntarily removing certain search results, such as those related to revenge porn or slander, without a court order. This process can be initiated by visiting a specific URL and filling out a form. Some individuals and companies, known as 'reputation managers', are charging people to remove damaging information from Google results, even though this can be done for free. This practice has been criticized as exploitative and unnecessary.

Main themes

• Google search result removal
• reputation management
• mugshot sites
• public records
• DIY electrical work
• homeowner's insurance
• regulatory differences

What commenters say

• Some people believe that Google's process for removing search results is not well-known, even among experts, and that this lack of awareness can be exploited by 'reputation managers'.
• The effectiveness of Google's process in removing damaging information is limited, particularly when it comes to mugshot sites and other types of public records.
• There is a debate about the ethics of removing public records, such as mugshots, from search results, with some arguing that it is a form of censorship and others arguing that it is necessary to protect individuals from harm.
• The practice of charging people to remove damaging information from Google results is seen as unfair and exploitative by some, while others argue that it can be a legitimate service for those who are not tech-savvy or do not have the time to do it themselves.
• Some commenters have questioned the idea that DIY electrical work can invalidate a homeowner's insurance policy, with some arguing that this is a myth with no basis in fact.
• Others have pointed out that while DIY electrical work may be allowed in some cases, it can still be risky and may not be covered by insurance if something goes wrong.
• There is a discussion about the differences in laws and regulations regarding electrical work and insurance between different countries and regions.
• Some people believe that the concept of 'reputation management' is legitimate and that companies and individuals should be able to charge for their services, while others see it as a scam.