Google can ban your Android app if they think you’ve clicked on your own ads (danfabulich.medium.com)

Article summary

The article discusses Google's policy of banning Android apps if they suspect the developer of clicking on their own ads. This has sparked a discussion about the company's power and lack of an appeal system. Some commenters are concerned about the implications of this policy and the potential for abuse. The conversation has also touched on the topic of domain registrars and their policies.

Main themes

• Google's ban policy
• domain registrars
• free speech
• hate groups
• censorship
• societal norms

What commenters say

• Google's ban policy is too strict and can lead to unfair treatment of developers.
• Domain registrars like Epik and Namecheap have their own set of problems, including tolerance for hate groups and questionable business practices.
• Free speech should be protected, even for those with unpopular or extremist views, to avoid censorship and potential abuse of power.
• Companies have a responsibility to enforce societal norms and reject customers who promote hate or violence.
• The lack of an appeal system for banned apps and domains is a major concern, as it can lead to false positives and unfair treatment.
• Some argue that companies like CloudFlare are hypocritical in their defense of free speech, as they host terrorist sites while claiming to support freedom of expression.
• Others believe that private companies should not be in the business of law enforcement and that such matters should be left to the authorities.
• The conversation highlights the complexity of balancing free speech, societal norms, and the need to prevent harm and abuse.