Web by Google (TM) (landshark.io)

Article summary

The article discusses Google's dominance over the web, citing its control over search, video infrastructure, and web standards. Google's deal with Mozilla, which accounts for 70% of Mozilla's revenue, is seen as a way to keep the anti-trust hounds at bay. The article argues that Google's capture of the web is a fait accompli and that only legislation can prevent the web from becoming a Google monopoly. The author also highlights the lack of native search and payments on the web as factors that contributed to Google's dominance.

Main themes

• Google's dominance
• Web monopoly
• Anti-trust legislation
• Native search and payments
• AMP technology
• Web standards
• Market competition
• Legislative solutions

What commenters say

• Google's dominance is not a permanent state and will eventually be overtaken by another company.
• The web's lack of native search and payments led to Google's monopoly.
• Breaking up Google would be a good start to preventing its dominance.
• Google's control over the web is not entirely its fault, but rather a result of the web's evolution.
• AMP is a technically unjustifiable and value-destroying technology that only benefits Google.
• The concept of AMP is sound, but its implementation is flawed and driven by Google's interests.
• Google's dominance is a result of its ability to provide valuable services and solutions that people want to use.
• Legislation is necessary to prevent Google's monopoly and promote a healthier web ecosystem.