GitHub isn't fun anymore (jaredpalmer.com)

Article summary

The article discusses how GitHub is not fun anymore, but the content of the article is not available. The comments reveal that users have different opinions about GitHub's features, such as stars, trending page, and social network-like features. Some users find these features useful for discovering new projects and building traction, while others think they are unnecessary or even annoying. The discussion also touches on the topic of project discovery and the role of social features in open-source projects.

Main themes

• GitHub features
• project discovery
• social network-like features
• open-source community
• platform priorities
• user preferences

What commenters say

• GitHub's stars are not a reliable measure of a project's quality or usefulness.
• The trending page is useful for discovering new projects, but its algorithm can be flawed.
• Social network-like features on GitHub are unnecessary and may drive users away.
• The platform's focus on engagement and recommendations can be at odds with its primary function as a tool for developers.
• Some users prefer to use external services, such as Hacker News or Reddit, for project discovery and discussion.
• The introduction of social features on GitHub has led to chaos, tribalism, and idea bubbles, rather than a meritocratic community.
• GitHub's UI and network effects are major reasons why users prefer it over other platforms, such as GitLab.
• The platform should prioritize its core functions and professional requirements over social features and engagement.