New York Times phasing out all 3rd-party advertising data (axios.com)

Article summary

The New York Times is phasing out all 3rd-party advertising data. This move is seen as a step in the right direction by some, but others argue that more needs to be done to protect user privacy. The discussion around this topic highlights the complexities of online advertising and data tracking. The New York Times' decision may have implications for the future of online advertising and user privacy.

Main themes

• online advertising
• user privacy
• data tracking
• opt-out systems
• subscription management
• regulatory solutions

What commenters say

• Some argue that banning all 3rd-party tracking, data brokering, and individually tailored advertising is necessary to protect user privacy.
• Others believe that clear disclosures and easy opt-outs are sufficient to protect user privacy, and that a ban is not necessary.
• The effectiveness of opt-out systems is questioned, with some arguing that they are impractical and do not provide adequate protection for users.
• Making online advertising opt-in by default is proposed as a potential solution to protect user privacy.
• Some users are willing to whitelist websites that do not use 3rd-party tracking, but others are skeptical about the impact of this approach.
• The use of virtual credit card numbers and other tools is discussed as a way to protect user privacy and avoid unwanted subscriptions.
• The difficulty of canceling subscriptions, particularly with the New York Times, is highlighted as a problem that needs to be addressed.