Apple dropped plan for encrypting backups after FBI complained (reuters.com)

Article summary

Apple dropped a plan to encrypt iCloud backups after the FBI complained, according to a report. The company's iCloud security overview states that backups are encrypted in transit and on the server, but does not provide details about the encryption keys. This means that Apple has access to the encryption keys and can potentially access user data. The decision has sparked a debate about the balance between user privacy and law enforcement access to data.

Main themes

• Apple and FBI
• iCloud encryption
• user privacy
• law enforcement access
• consumer choice
• encryption and security

What commenters say

• Some argue that Apple's decision to not encrypt iCloud backups end-to-end is a compromise on user privacy, while others see it as a necessary measure to assist law enforcement.
• The notion that consumers can 'vote with their wallet' is disputed, with some arguing that there are limited alternatives to Apple and Google in the smartphone market.
• The idea that encryption hinders law enforcement investigations is countered by the argument that it is the responsibility of law enforcement to adapt to new technologies and find alternative methods of investigation.
• There is a concern that the lack of end-to-end encryption in iCloud backups creates a vulnerability for users, particularly in cases where the company may be compelled to hand over data to governments or other entities.
• Some commenters argue that the trade-off between privacy and security is a complex issue that requires careful consideration, and that companies like Apple have a responsibility to balance these competing interests.
• Others argue that the benefits of end-to-end encryption, including increased user privacy and security, outweigh the potential drawbacks, including the potential impact on law enforcement investigations.