Let's build houses for people, not cars (noparkinghere.com)

Article summary

The article discusses the issue of prioritizing car parking over housing in cities, with a focus on Los Angeles. It suggests that the city has an oversupply of parking and that this comes at the expense of much-needed housing. The article proposes policies such as parking maximums to address this issue. The exact details of the article are not available, but the comments suggest that it argues for a shift in urban planning priorities.

Main themes

• urban planning
• parking policy
• housing supply
• car culture
• public transportation
• sustainable cities

What commenters say

• Some argue that reducing parking availability will lead to cars piling up on streets, while others see it as a necessary step to promote more sustainable urban planning.
• The city's current parking requirements are seen as a major obstacle to building more housing, and some propose relaxing or eliminating these requirements.
• There is disagreement over whether public transportation in Los Angeles is sufficient, with some arguing that it is limited and inconvenient for locals, while others see it as a viable option for commuting.
• The role of car ownership in urban life is a point of contention, with some seeing it as a necessary aspect of freedom and mobility, while others argue that it imposes significant external costs on the environment and society.
• Some commenters suggest that a grid-based public transportation system would be more effective in a city like Los Angeles, while others argue that a hub-and-spoke model is more suitable.
• The comparison with European cities, such as Berlin and Amsterdam, highlights the differences in urban planning and transportation culture between the US and Europe.
• The cost of public transportation in German cities is seen as a barrier to its adoption, despite the existence of comprehensive networks.
• There is a perceived trade-off between building more housing and preserving parking availability, with some arguing that the city should prioritize the former.